« Test-Chile
Empire Geometry
How each empire's shape changed as it gained and lost cities.
Chile
| Turn |
Cities |
Span |
Spacing |
Elongation |
| 0 |
1 |
0 |
— |
— |
| 34 |
2 |
8 |
8.0 |
1.0 |
| 52 |
3 |
12 |
6.7 |
1.38 |
Vietnam
| Turn |
Cities |
Span |
Spacing |
Elongation |
| 0 |
1 |
0 |
— |
— |
| 22 |
2 |
4 |
4.0 |
1.0 |
| 31 |
3 |
9 |
4.3 |
1.5 |
| 75 |
4 |
9 |
4.3 |
1.54 |
| 75 |
5 |
9 |
4.2 |
1.5 |
| 120 |
6 |
9 |
4.2 |
1.47 |
| 121 |
7 |
14 |
4.3 |
1.96 |
| 140 |
8 |
18 |
4.1 |
2.14 |
| 144 |
9 |
18 |
4.1 |
2.03 |
Bolivia
| Turn |
Cities |
Span |
Spacing |
Elongation |
| 0 |
1 |
0 |
— |
— |
| 25 |
2 |
6 |
6.0 |
1.0 |
| 39 |
3 |
6 |
4.7 |
1.13 |
| 55 |
4 |
8 |
4.5 |
1.41 |
| 105 |
5 |
12 |
4.4 |
1.85 |
| 112 |
6 |
12 |
4.0 |
1.68 |
| 112 |
7 |
12 |
4.0 |
1.67 |
| 130 |
8 |
12 |
4.0 |
1.6 |
| 140 |
9 |
12 |
4.0 |
1.59 |
Iroquois
| Turn |
Cities |
Span |
Spacing |
Elongation |
| 0 |
1 |
0 |
— |
— |
| 31 |
2 |
4 |
4.0 |
1.0 |
| 43 |
3 |
8 |
4.0 |
1.5 |
| 52 |
4 |
11 |
4.0 |
1.74 |
| 57 |
5 |
12 |
4.0 |
1.79 |
| 100 |
6 |
13 |
4.0 |
1.77 |
| 101 |
7 |
13 |
4.0 |
1.86 |
| 110 |
8 |
23 |
5.0 |
2.33 |
| 120 |
9 |
23 |
4.0 |
2.05 |
| 142 |
10 |
31 |
4.6 |
2.41 |
Distances in hexes.
Measured on a map 46 tiles wide, inferred from the plots rather than reported by the log.
Spacing is the mean distance to the nearest own city: 7 leaves no tiles shared at full growth, around 4 means cities
permanently overlap. Elongation near 1.4 is a compact empire, 2 and above one strung out in a line.